A few days ago, an article on famous New York lawyer Caitlin J. Halligan, was rejected on judicial position in the government due to her activist views on gun control. As a republican, she was denied votes from the Republican Party. Now doesn't that seem a little weird?? Why would she be denied for a second time for the same reason ?? According to the Republican Party, they do do believe that gun control is necessary regardless of all murders and crimes committed by those with possession of an arm. But because they don't want to "spread her activist ideas" throughout the government, they'd rather deny her her right to attain such job. Don't they have other views that others in the government oppose? So why are they doing that to her, disregarding her well known qualities to be in that position. She's quite fit for the job, but because she's a woman activist against one of the things they believe in, they won't let her be. How disappointing..
If any of you want to see more of the article, here's the link---http://nyti.ms/Xr3LOT
No comments:
Post a Comment